
«Architecture is a powerful tool that materialises concepts into physical spaces.»
«Architecture is a powerful tool that materialises concepts into physical spaces.»
«Architecture is a powerful tool that materialises concepts into physical spaces.»
We are ACT! and CLAYA, two offices based respectively in Oslo, Norway and Marseille, France + Germany. We worked together in 2024 for the Færderbiennale in Tønsberg as we connected through our common passion for earth and natural materials.
CLAYA is an architecture and practice studio based in Germany and Marseille, France, founded by us - Elisa and Babsi- in 2020. The studio's name, "CLAYA", a feminine name meaning "made from clay", represents our connection to earth as a building material. We explore clay across diverse fields, including knowledge transfer through workshops, design, and craft. Our work is driven by a strong belief in the material’s potential as a sustainable building resource for the future, and by a fascination with its unique characteristics and circularity.
ACT! is a franco-norwegian studio founded in 2021 by Armelle Breuil. Engaged about social, spatial and climate justice, the studio explores actions that can be taken within the field of architecture to tackle these issues. Our work encompasses architectural design with a focus on adaptation, natural materials and reuse; mediating architecture as away of raising awareness and empowering, and activism to investigate inequalities.
CLAYA: CLAYA grew out of a shared journey that began somewhat by chance. We both found our way into architecture through different paths, studying at TU Dortmund and the University of Innsbruck, neither of which focused heavily on sustainable building materials at the time. But before and during our studies, we had already gathered practical experience in craftsmanship: Elisa completed a carpentry apprenticeship, while Babsi worked on building sites. Focusing our practice on materials, one in particular drew our attention: earth. In 2019, our paths crossed during an internship at Lehm Ton Erde founded by Martin Rauch, which marked the beginning of many shared projects, a close friendship, and eventually the founding of CLAYA in 2020.
ACT!: For me the way into architecture was the desire to be a changemaker:
I was interested in the social aspect of the field and working with a profession involved in “public interest” as I’ve been working as a volunteer with associations during my high school. My understanding about architecture evolved from being primarily about space making and its social aspects to biopolitics, wise material use and respect for the environment. It was a shock to realise that the access to architecture was very exclusive to a happy few humans. After two years of intense climate activism in 2018-2020, it was an evidence to start my own office allowing me truly to be as much activist as architect, ACT!.
CLAYA: Our first project took place in Bahia, Brazil, where the artist Luis Casanova Sorolla was building an artist residency using local materials. Together with the local workers, we constructed a rammed earth wall and floor. It was our first very small project, where we were involved in every step of the planning process: gathering materials, testing, guiding the workers on-site, as well as planning and constructing the formwork and the space itself. Suddenly, COVID-19 hit, and we both traveled back to Germany. During the quarantine period, we began converting a residential building to an art school in the Ruhr Area. From wall openings and installing wall heating systems covered with clay plaster (made from locally excavated material) to producing ceramic tiles with KARAK, and crafting wooden furniture, we used this time to live out our vision of architecture: uniting design and hands-on practice. This project drew the attention of many visitors attending painting lessons, who experienced a unique indoor climate and an unfamiliar design, which led to further commissions.
ACT!: Working as a group is always richer than working alone. My first projects in Oslo were released in collaboration with Axel Borhaven and Martin Håskjold Larsen, with a close collaboration with the carpenter Jonas Garson. The second one, Bademaschinen, was very rich as we were involved in all aspects of the design since we wanted to focus on re-use. When starting ACT! I had the idea that the studio could be a collective. Yet, it’s hard to involve others in a start-up and I was always envious of people that started a collective right after school where they found their mate. I had the luck to be joined for two years by another engaged architect of my age, Rikke Winther, before we decided to collaborate in other ways from this year-on. The biggest challenge of starting on your own to me is to find clients that are willing to pay for your services, or fundings for self initiated projects. The best incident in my opinion is all the new people one meets – for example CLAYA!
CLAYA: For us, networking has been a crucial part of our journey. It has connected us to people, projects, and ideas that have had a significant impact on our work. A great example of this is how we connected with ACT!, who discovered us through the Kontextur studio list. This connection led to collaborations for the Færderbiennale in Norway 2024. The network in earth construction is relatively small, which is actually quite nice. In this niche, everyone knows each other, and the scene is very accessible. This has helped us navigate the broader world of architecture.
CLAYA: So far, we haven’t spent much time working in traditional architecture offices. Instead, we’re a classic case for he concept learning by doing. From the beginning, we’ve relied on a supportive network—and we’re just as happy to give back, sharing our knowledge when asked. What we’ve found in studios and on construction sites that focus on sustainable materials is a different kind of social interaction, one that is based on exchanging ideas without competitiveness, and a spirit of collaboration. We like the idea of an autonomous, small, women-led company. We are not just a studio that hands off completed designs; rather, we are motivated to take part in the building process of what we design, depending on the project size, of course.
ACT!: I had the chance to effectuate several nice internships and to work in two great offices in Oslo. My bosses in both offices were amazing as they took the time to answer my questions about the backstage of an office which helped me for starting on my own. The main transition for me was to realise that the employer wasn't necessarily the one blocking ideas, risk taking orcreation as I thought as an employee – our field is complex, full of regulations, difficult clients with tight budgets and … the economy of an architecture office is volatile!
CLAYA: We work either digital or directly on site. Our aim is to work more analog in an atelier that also offers space for storage and a showroom for materials.
ACT! is located in a cute frontstore, together with other creatives. We’re renting this space for two years and a half and we’ve rearranged it many times. If you’re in Oslo, come and say hi!
CLAYA: Our built environment directly affects our actions, relationships, and the way we work. For us, the essence of architecture lies in taking responsibility for people, nature, and culture, as it shapes not only our external surroundings but also our inner well-being, cultural identity, and ecosystem.
ACT!: Architecture is a powerful tool that materialises concepts into physical spaces. It can bring social and ecological change and help to create other narratives. It can also be used as a weapon to exclude or destroy the environment. Therefore architects have a great responsibility.
Book/Magazine:
CLAYA: Constructed Earth, Martin Rauch
ACT!: The dispossessed, Ursula Le Guin
Building:
CLAYA: Haus Rauch, Austria by Roger Boltshauser
ACT!: Casa Batlló, Barcelona by Gaudi
Mentor/Architect:
CLAYA: Hanno Burtscher (Earthman)
ACT!: A teacher who became a friend, Brent Patterson, an inspiring friend Emmanuelle Déchelette, my ex boss at Spacegroup Gary Bates.
Building material:
CLAYA: Earth
ACT!: Circular materials
Spatial Memory:
CLAYA: Celestial Staircase, Morocco by Hansjörg Voth
ACT: Mycket exhibition at the Oslo Architecture Triennale; Emanuel Vigeland's Musoleum at Slemdal
CLAYA: Taking earth construction as an example, we are convinced that a good balance can be struck between contemporary architectural practices and technological innovation, combined with ancient methods and ideas. Architecture should offer logical solutions that are both practical and sustainable, moving away from over-reliance on high-tech innovations and instead returning to low-tech systems. Another key goal is to ensure that no waste is left behind. Everything constructed should be designed for reuse in multifunctional ways, with earth serving as an example, being a material that has a lot of positive impacts for future generations. Now and in the future, it is time to cultivate a distinct architectural language for earth construction, one that must be rediscovered as we begin to relearn how to work with it.
ACT!: Imagine that… by 2050, architecture has fully embraced its role in climate adaptation. Since the global moratorium on new construction in 2026— started in Denmark a year earlier by Byggestopbevægelsen and extended to rest of the world by the collectives ACAN and Architects4Future —demolition is outlawed, and architects focus on repairing, reusing, and transforming existing structures. Architectural education now centers on natural materials like earth, straw, and mycelium, and on developing skills for repair, adaptation, and care. Inspired by the reparative visions of Zosia Dzierżawska and Charlotte Malterre-Barthes, architects are deeply embedded in communities, guiding citizens through the challenges of climate change, designing new forms of collective living, and regenerating the built environment with care and craft.
One of the profession’s greatest victories came with the global realization of housing as a human right. Despite climate-driven displacement, every person now has access to shelter. Private transports are history; cities are pedestrian, with global public transport networks reaching even the most remote places. In Europe, collective housing has become the standard, replacing profit-driven models with systems of mutual support and shared resources. Hunger has faded through communitygardening in urban green spaces—sustained by weekly contributions from residents. Architects in 2050 don’t just build; they cultivate systems of solidarity, repair, and resilience.
CLAYA: An important step would be to internalize the environmental impacts of construction materials, such as CO2 emissions, over their entire lifecycle into their pricing structure. By reflecting these impacts in material costs, holistically sustainable building materials would naturally become more economically viable. Moreover, we need to critically question the practice of demolition. Existing buildings should be preserved and adapted wherever possible, rather than being torn down.
Renovation and transformation of existing structures are not only more resource-efficient but also essential for minimizing waste and conserving embodied energy. Supportive political and legislative frameworks are needed to incentivize sustainable choices. These include policies that prioritize life cycle assessments, promote the reuse and recycling of materials, and discourage short-term, cost-driven decisions that overlook long-term ecological impacts.
Just if enough space: In addition, addressing these challenges demands closer collaboration across disciplines. Insights from environmental science, material research, sociology, anthropology, and even agriculture can offer valuableperspectives on how we build and what we value in our built environment. Establishing such interdisciplinary approaches—especially in architectural education—should become standard practice. Only by integrating diverse forms of knowledge can we develop the tools and mindsets needed for a truly sustainable and socially responsible architecture.
CLAYA: If there were one skill we could recommend to a young architect, it would be the connection between materials and design. Gaining hands-on experience on construction sites, both before and after studies, is essential. Tactile experiences bring projects a richness of atmosphere and depth. By giving greater emphasis to tactile experiences, we do not only conceptualize materials during the planning process, but also engage with them physically andexperience them firsthand. This approach allows us to develop a deeper understanding of their properties and theirimpact on the built environment—especially with regard to climate protection and creating healthy living environments.
CLAYA: We love working with rough models and sketches. A simple sketchbook, where you’re not afraid to draw the first line. Using basic materials like paper or clay models allows us to make mistakes and experiment freely.
ACT!: Sketches, color pens and collages. Lately reusing model as a way to free my mind from the computer program.
CLAYA: ERDEN, Studio Mediterranee, Hütten und Paläste, Andy Goldsworthy, re:arc institute, atelier Régis Roudil
ACT!: Exutoire, Mould.earth, Vincent Dumay, ACAN, Léa Hobson
Project 1
Project 2
Bademaschinen, is a floating sauna complex in Oslo's harbor, designed around innovative reuse. Collaboratively created with Borhaven Arkitekter and Fjord Ingeniører, the project repurposes teak window frames from the 1960s-era Grandenursing home in Drøbak, with glass panes replaced by oiled plywood, forming the sauna's distinctive exterior walls.
This approach not only reduces waste but also imbues the structure with historical character, echoing the design of 19th-century sea bathhouses, Sjøbadehus. The facility comprises two saunas and two towers housing changing rooms, arranged around a communal square. Constructed with red royal-treated spruce and featuring a color palette inspired by Oslo's Akershus Fortress, Bademaschinen stands as a testament to how material constraints can inspire architectural innovation, transforming salvaged elements into a cohesive and culturally resonant public space.