«Architecture seeks to give meaning to the elements that assist and lead us in our daily lives.»
«Architecture seeks to give meaning to the elements that assist and lead us in our daily lives.»
«Architecture seeks to give meaning to the elements that assist and lead us in our daily lives.»
As students in Franco-Chinese dual master’s degree, it’s between Strasbourg and Shanghai that we are experimenting the city and its architectures. We seek to take the opportunity to understand the narrative structure of the urban, from the small object to the hyperstructure.
Each project is a complete commitment to try to grasp all the issues that gravitate around it. We are convinced that one of the great challenges facing architects today is to achieve "simplexity". This research tends to synthesize complexity in simplicity by considering all possible and unimaginable solutions. The purpose of our work is to avoid unfruitful digression, nonsense or misdirection. We seek to find a state of equilibrium, a stability. Sometimes, there are oversimplifications, twists of imperfect accuracies that are not always interesting. Then, new answers are explored. However, are there still answers?
How is it still possible to dissociate architecture and urban thinking? How to unravel the Shanghai urban matrix? How can we feel legitimate in projecting space into an unknown and uncertain territory as Shanghai? That’s what we learned from this project. Shanghai is a tangle of movements, rhythms, punctuations. The urban is constantly reproducing erratically. Superpositions, slips, frictions of figures and fabrics of all kinds are created. The challenge is then to decrypt the complexity in order to decipher, understand and project possible solutions.
Drawing / Poem
Drawing / Poem
"L’atelier de la recherché patiente" said Le Corbusier is a decisive moment in the formation of an architect. The atelieris the place where the project becomes a collective act. Everyone invests their uniqueness in researches. We manipulate, develop solutions and create interactions. We learn that architecture is not about simply to fill, to build but about what it generates around it. In our opinion, education appears as a completion. What is more rewarding and satisfying than passing on what has taken years to learn, build and experiment? Teaching is about make people want to learn, awake their curiosity, make people discover hidden and buried desires. To be continued.
Working space
Working space
Architecture seeks to give meaning to the elements that assist and lead us in our daily lives. Architecture is certainly adopting a posture but it’s above all enriching a reality. We believe that an architecture must create physical or intangible links, reactivate or amplify the landscape in which it is part, and celebrate the genius loci.
A Book:
Claire – Images des microcosmes flottant by Olivier Meystre for the representation, the singular ways to imagine and consider the project.
Pierre-Alexis – Et si la beauté rendait heureux by F.Cardinal, P.Thibaut for ode of the beauty in simple things around us.
A Person:
Claire – Alvaro Siza, for his recognition of reality.
Pierre-Alexis – Luca Merlini, for his overflowing imaginaries, sometimes absurd but always inspiring.
A Building:
Claire – Punta de la Dogona, Tadao Ando for the evidence.
Pierre-Alexis – House in Yokohama, Kazuo Shinohara for the mystery, experimentation, the audacity of the dialogue between tradition and modernity.
References allow us to compare postures, irrigate the thought, inspire the outline. Words, poetry or even sketches help us to immerse ourselves. All these mediums help us to exhaust a subject. Then comes the moment when everything dissolves, dilutes and gradually gives way to the essence of the project. Next, the computer tools extend our ideas, highlight atmospheres and finally affirm the decisions. Every document has to offer something. It is up to us to find the right way to give meaning to the project, to serve and amplify it.
Sketch / Visualisation
Sketch / Visualisation
The architect often tends toward producing images to satisfy his/her desires of expression. The idea of compulsion tends to make us dependent, irrational, and productive otherwise. One of the main questions is to know: what is the actual role of the architect and what are his limits. Architecture can’t appear as a vulgar personal expression but as a reply to a complexity of factors. We know that time and space cannot be immobilized. The uncatchable and elusive has become omnipresent. How can this instability consider as a potential to exploit? How to update our way of doing and think the city?
Project